Recent Posts

January 27, 2010

The Riverfront Times' Keegan Hamilton has written a very in-depth and informative piece this week on the bar exemptions in both St. Louis City and St. Louis County's laws, set to take effect on January 2, 2011.  In our view, when all bars and restaurants are covered in a law, there's less confusion and enforcement is much simpler.  Unfortunately, the passed laws don't do this and fail to protect the most exposed group of workers.  As this article shows, there is more work left to do to protect all workers and patrons in St. Louis from secondhand smoke.  We look forward to continuing the positive change we've begun and the work that remains to make all St. Louis workplaces 100% smoke-free.

Riverfront Times
When sweeping smoking bans take effect next year, many bar patrons might not even notice the difference

rftcover.JPGBy Keegan Hamilton
January 27, 2010

Krueger's Bar and Grill is a block and a world away from the Ritz-Carlton. Here, on Forsyth Boulevard a few hundred feet past Clayton's border with University City, there's taxidermy mounted on the walls, a Willie Nelson tune humming on the jukebox and bottles of Busch lined up along the bar.

But before the senses take in any of that, another element of Krueger's vibe informs the well-heeled Ritz guest that he has wandered far afield from the fancy hotel down the street. What pops you in the snot locker the instant you step through the front door of this blue-collar watering hole is the unmistakable scent of tobacco. Generations of smokers have imbued the one-room space, whose uninterrupted heritage as a saloon dates back to 1936, with a patina of smoke that clings to the red-brick walls like an invisible coat of paint.

Inside on a frigid January afternoon, Adam Becker snatches black plastic ashtrays from atop the bar's cigarette machine and sets them in front of familiar customers before they can even take their seats. Tall and lanky with a generous hooked nose and a broad smile, Becker inherited the business from his father, Charlie, who bought the place in 1946 and elected to leave the name of the previous proprietor on the sign out front.

Becker says his father is appalled by the indoor smoking bans recently approved in the St. Louis area. "He's overwhelmed," the tavernkeeper says, shaking his head. "He just can't believe you can tell people what to do with their own businesses."

The younger Becker, on the other hand, says he can hardly wait for the day in July when the city of Clayton begins enforcing the smoking restrictions its council ratified this past summer. Ditto January 2011, when similar ordinances take effect in the City of St. Louis and throughout St. Louis County. The laws will prohibit smoking indoors in government buildings and most public places, including many restaurants and bars.

But Becker's not eager for the day he'll finally be able to leave work without smelling like an ashtray. No, the barman, who says he has smoked Marlboro reds since, well, "shit, for a long time," is thrilled because he fully expects Krueger's to be among the businesses that are exempt from the county's ban, owing to an exception for bars that earn most of their money from liquor sales.

Because Krueger's is located just outside of Clayton -- a municipality where all restaurants and bars will be smoke-free -- Becker intends to cash in on the crowd of soon-to-be-displaced tobacco users.

"I think business will boom," he predicts. "I already have some customers asking if we'll be exempt. I'm figuring out how to cater to them. I was thinking about putting a big sticker on the door that says 'Smokers Welcome.'"

Krueger's situation is hardly unique.

The city's smoking ban, approved this past October by the St. Louis Board of Aldermen, contains its own gaping loophole, a provision that will permit many small taverns to continue to allow smoking for at least the next five years.

"Thank God it's not going to affect us," says Marci Miki, the bartender at Rosie's Place, a smoke-steeped hole-in-the-wall on Laclede Avenue in the Central West End. "People across the street at those restaurants -- when they want to come smoke and drink, they'll come right over here."

Of course, not everyone is enthusiastic about the new regime. Many business owners who will be subject to the prohibitions fear they'll lose loyal but nicotine-addicted customers to competitors like Krueger's and Rosie's.

Meantime, smoking-ban advocates lament that the local measures, while better than nothing, are among the least stringent in the nation.

The breakdown of businesses that will or won't be entitled to exemptions remains hazy. The public officials who will be in charge of implementing the laws when they take effect next year aren't even sure how they'll go about deciding who qualifies or how they'll sanction scofflaws.  Click HERE for the rest of the feature length story.



January 19, 2010

Tap Room Will Be Smoke-Free!

 
Last Friday, via Twitter, Schlafly announced that its city location, the Tap Room will be smoke-free starting January 26.  Their county location, Bottleworks, opened smoke-free. We're thrilled that all workers and patrons there will be protected from secondhand smoke.  Let's hope other bars will follow their lead instead of waiting 11 more months to clear the air.

Schlafly Tap Room Goes Non-Smoking
Riverfront Times, January 15, 2010
By Annie Zaleski
As found via Twitter: The Schlafly Tap Room will be going non-smoking on January 26. The venue is one of the first to embrace the smoking ban, which doesn't officially go into effect until 2011.

January 14, 2010

Maryville, MO looks to strengthen their smoke-free law to include bars

Smoking ban advocates aim for spot in June election
By Tony Brown
Maryville Daily Forum
Thu Jan 14, 2010,

Citizens for a Smoke-free Nodaway County have given up their attempt to get a workplace smoking ban petition referendum before Maryville voters during the April 6 election.

But organizers of the effort to prohibit smoking inside all places of employment inside the city limits, including private clubs, say they will soldier on and have set their sights on the following election date of June 8.

Teri Harr, a spokesperson for the smoke-free coalition and the health education coordinator at St. Francis Hospital & Health Services, said the group met Tuesday and has already collected 500 signatures of the approximately 1,700 needed for ballot certification.

In order to make the April ballot, the group would have had to turn those signatures in for municipal review and ultimate certification by Nodaway County Clerk Beth Walker last week.

The petition effort, which began late last year, hit a snag after the City of Maryville discovered it lacked the statutory machinery to allow such a petition drive to move forward. Maryville's City Council moved quickly to pass an authorizing ordinance governing initiatives and referendums on Dec. 28, but the holiday season and the worst winter weather in more than 20 years slowed the signature collection effort.

Now that it has decided to shoot for June, Citizens for a Smoke-free Nodaway County has about seven weeks to collect the necessary signatures. Harr said volunteers -- including high school students active in the local Smoke Busters program -- are already in the field asking parents, friends and neighbors to support the referendum.

State law requires that in order for a third-class city like Maryville to get a referendum on the ballot, petitioners must collect verifiable signatures from 25 percent of the registered voters living within the city limits. Harr said the group hopes to "pad" it's petition with about 300 extra signatures, for a total of 2,000, since some names will probably be thrown out. She also said the group will meet again on Feb. 2 in order to organize a door-to-door campaign.

In the meantime, Maryville voters wishing to sign the petition may do so at the Nodaway County Health Center. Smoking ban supporters must sign their names, print their names and give their address, and then each page of 14 signatures must be notarized.

Harr said she was confident that the measure will go before voters in June.

"I really have no doubt that if we get out door to door we'll be able to get the signatures we need," she said. "I was very pleasantly surprised by the number of people who came to the meeting and said they would help. It's a lot of work.

"It takes time and effort to go out and get the signatures."

In deference to local business owners and private organizations who have voiced opposition to the smoking ban, the coalition has modified its proposed ordinance.

If approved, the measure would now ban smoking inside all workplaces and outside for 10 feet from main entrances, rather than 20 feet as first proposed. In addition, smoking would be allowed on decks and patios provided that such outdoor spaces are not staffed.

"Our basic premise is that we are trying to protect workers. So if they have a deck, and there is no worker there, people can can go out and smoke," Harr said.

January 4, 2010

Kirkwood is Now Smoke-Free!

As of Saturday, January 2, all bars, restaurants and workplaces in the City of Kirkwood are 100% smoke-free.  The smell of food is now what greets you at the door of Kirkwood establishments, not smoke.  Most importantly, the hundreds of hospitality workers (a lot of them teenagers) in Kirkwood are now protected from the health hazards of secondhand smoke.
 
For those who want to use the new law as motivation to quit, The Missouri Tobacco Quitline, 1-800-QUIT-NOW (800-784-8669), provides one-on-one phone counseling and support for smokers. When a smoker calls, they are provided a personalized plan and tools to quit smoking. Services are free of charge.

You can learn more about the new ordinance by contacting the City of Kirkwood at (314) 822-5802 or by visiting www.kirkwoodmo.org. The City of Kirkwood Police Department is the agency responsible for enforcement of the law. KPD will process complaints, document violations, and assess penalties.  To file a complaint or violation call (314) 822-5858.

Kirkwood Smoking Ban in Effect Saturday.
By Margaret Gillerman
ST. LOUIS POST-DISPATCH
12/30/2009

KIRKWOOD -- Kirkwood is preparing to say goodbye to smoke.

The cloud of smoke and strong odor of cigarettes that greet patrons at the door of the landmark Geyer Inn will be gone Saturday.

Late-night customers at PJ's Tavern won't be permitted to puff on a cigarette with their Bud Light.

Smoke-filled bars, restaurants and workplaces will be no more than a memory starting Jan. 2, when a smoking ban takes effect across the city. Voters overwhelmingly approved Kirkwood's Clean Air Act on Nov. 3.

Kirkwood will be the second St. Louis County municipality to go smoke-free; Ballwin is the other. They will be joined in July by Clayton.

The ban begins a year to the day ahead of those in St. Louis and St. Louis County. MORE METRO
 Get news, columns, photos and multimedia from the St. Louis area

In Jefferson County, Arnold has had a ban for several years. Illinois went smoke-free two years ago.

Saturday night will be the first big test for Kirkwood customers and businesses.

"It has been a long time coming," said Mary Murphy-Overmann, co-chair of Healthy Air for Kirkwood, the campaign committee that pushed for the ban. "We have been so far behind the rest of the country."

It was a far different story three years ago when Kirkwood voters defeated

a smoke-free proposal. At that time, several restaurant and bar owners fought the plan, saying it was vague. This year, the ordinance was reworded, and there was no organized opposition.

"I think a lot has happened over the last few years," said Debra Cotten, co-chair of Healthy Air for Kirkwood. "There's a lot more demand for smoke-free places. The timing is just right."

Cotten expects Saturday night will be a positive step.

"We're getting out our base to support the restaurants and bars that are making this transition Saturday night and beyond that," she said.

Kirkwood restaurant and bar owners who now permit smoking in their establishments seemed resigned to the change, but some expressed concern about going it alone for a year until the countywide ban.

Few bars or restaurants had taken any steps to prepare for Saturday's change, although some owners were considering spiffing up their patios, where smoking will be allowed. Others talked about installing outdoor heaters for smokers.

Paul Cartier, owner of both PJ's and the smoke-free Jefferson Grill next door, said his late-night bar crowd included some smokers.

"I think we'll lose some, but hopefully we'll gain some other people back," Cartier said.

He added: "It may be tough going for a year before the rest of the county has a ban. But I think most people will get used to it. We'll wait and see what happens, and then make adjustments.

"Three years ago, I was a lot more concerned," he added. "It's different now."

Some customers who smoke said they might opt out and head to nearby suburbs without bans, such as Des Peres. At PJ's, only two customers at the bar had lighted cigarettes one recent evening.

"I'm not a fan of the smoking ban" said Jim Fox, 23, who sat with some buddies and a pack of Parliaments.

"I go out and eat around here and don't mind that the restaurants don't allow smoking at dinner. But if I want to have a beer, I want a cigarette -- they go hand in hand," Fox said. "I'm not going to go someplace where I can't smoke."

Marty Smith, a manager at Mike Duffy's Bar and Grill, predicted a rough first year. "When the ban goes countywide, we'll all relax," he said.

The biggest change may be at the old country-style tavern, the Geyer Inn, a lively place with lots of smoke and music.

"I don't know what we can do about it;" said bartender Jacque Raffety. "Kirkwood has a strong ordinance."

The St. Louis and St. Louis County bans next year will exempt more businesses, but Kirkwood's rules will still apply in its city limits.

Longtime customer Mike Crawford has quit smoking but still enjoys the friendliness of the Geyer Inn. He and other customers say they'll remain loyal, even after Saturday.

Brandon Rosenberg of Arnold said he had seen smoking bans put small bars out of business in other states. But the Geyer Inn might be different.

"People come here because they love the place," Rosenberg said.

One of those is Gabel Richardson, a Marine just home from Iraq and Afghanistan. "I fought for our country, and I think everyone should be able to smoke," he said.

Stacy Reliford of the American Cancer Society said the new law promotes public health:

"Kirkwood's new smoke-free law is among the strongest in the area and will help to protect workers and customers from the known health hazards of secondhand smoke."

December 22, 2009

At brew pub, Michigan governor signs smokefree law
By KATHY BARKS HOFFMAN (AP)
December 18, 2009

LANSING, Mich. -- Most Michigan residents will find their work places, restaurants and bars smoke-free beginning May 1 now that Gov. Jennifer Granholm has signed a smoking ban into law.

But the new law could still face a court challenge, with bars and restaurants affected by the ban arguing it's discriminatory to exempt three Detroit casinos.

The Democratic governor signed the measure Friday at Michigan Brewing Co., a downtown Lansing brew pub that already bans smoking. She said the pub's experience with going smoke-free shows that "you can make a go of it and be very successful, and be healthy as well."

Dozens of smoking ban advocates crowded into the restaurant, erupting into loud cheers when Granholm announced after signing the bill, "It's done!"

"This is the greatest gift we could give the citizens of Michigan because it keeps on giving," said state Sen. Ron Jelinek, a Three Oaks Republican who helped craft the compromise that became law.

The ban applies to all bars, restaurants and work places, including private clubs and fraternal organizations.

The only exceptions are the Detroit casinos, cigar bars, tobacco specialty stores, home offices and motor vehicles. Although smoking will be allowed on casino gambling floors, it will be banned in the casinos' bars, restaurants and hotels.

Thousands of Michigan residents die each year from illnesses caused by secondhand smoke, Granholm said, adding that becoming the 38th state to limit smoking in public places makes a statement that Michigan cares about healthy lifestyles.

Anti-smoking advocates have worked for more than a decade to pass a smoking ban in Michigan. They were ecstatic Friday with the ban finally becoming law.

"Workers across the state are cheering as smoke-free air is finally a law in Michigan," Judy Stewart, Campaign for Smokefree Air campaign manager and government relations director at the American Cancer Society, said in a statement.

But Lance Binoniemi, executive director of the Michigan Licensed Beverage Association, said the ban will cost the state thousands of jobs if it's allowed to stand.

"We have certainly had a lot of concerns, a lot of questions, a lot of uncertainty," he said. "In the next four to six weeks, we're going to take a real serious look at any legal action that we may have a leg to stand on."

One ban the association is focusing on affects St. Louis, Mo., and contains a similar exemption for casinos. Bar and restaurant owners there are challenging the ban in court, Binoniemi said.

The MLBA is still trying to figure out if the ban applies to patio seating and where patrons will be allowed to smoke if they can't smoke inside a bar or restaurant.

"I don't know that even the governor or the Legislature know all those answers either, at this point," Binoniemi said. "It's all new to everyone."

November 30, 2009

A Smoke-Free Lambert?

Just before the Thanksgiving holiday, Mayor Slay posted a statement on his blog regarding the City's to-be-enacted smoke-free law and St. Louis Lambert International Airport.  The City's law does not exempt the airport while the County's law does.  The City owns the airport but it is located in the County.

Mayor Slay believes the airport should be smoke-free.  So do we. 

A bit of a media frenzy has ensued the last few days over the possibility of a smoke-free Lambert.  The airport's current director, who's leaving at the end of this year, claims removing the smoking lounges inside the airport will result in a security issue and leave many smokers outside the doors of the airport.  This line of reasoning is sort of silly when you consider the airports that are already 100% smoke-free across the country, especially those that are MUCH more busy than Lambert. 

There are now at least 150 smoke-free airports in the U.S.  Including Chicago O'Hare, JFK, La Guardia, Phoenix, LAX, Orlando, Las Vegas, Houston, Nashville, Seattle, Philadelphia, Kansas City, BWI, etc...  In fact, 21 of the nation's 30 busiest airports are 100% smoke-free indoors.

When visitors to our fair city step into our airport, indoor smoking shouldn't be what greets them.

Background on Smoking & Airports:
An interesting bit of history on smoking and airports - an internal tobacco industry document from the Tobacco Institute in 1991 details the industry's "Airport Strategy Plan". As part of this plan, the tobacco industry met with staff from the American Association of Airport Executives (AAAE) and helped the Association draft "An Airport Executive's Guide to Smoking Policies in Public Airports". The industry also targeted 43 airports (Lambert is one of them) for the provision of ventilation experts to convince the airports' executives that proper ventilation is better than smoking restrictions or bans.  

Full 6 Page Document here:  http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu/tid/zgb62f00/pdf;jsessionid=6689073F33BF73705A03F37D59171F42